AI agents make autonomous decisions at machine speed. A single hallucination, a single data leak, a single rogue agent can create material risk. MeetLoyd gives risk officers mathematical proof of compliance, instant kill capability, and continuous trust verification.
AI-related breaches involve more data, more systems, and more regulatory exposure than traditional breaches. The blast radius of a rogue AI agent is unbounded without governance.
When an AI agent goes rogue, how fast can you stop it? Without a kill switch hierarchy, "as fast as someone finds the terminal" is your incident response plan.
Is your AI agent hallucinating 1% of the time or 10%? Without mathematical verification, you're trusting, not verifying.
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025
"We have incident response for our existing systems"
Those systems don't make autonomous decisions at 1000x human speed. MeetLoyd's kill switch is hierarchical: agent → team → tenant. One click stops everything. Auto-recovery from expired emergency actions. Cascading notification to all stakeholders. DORA-compliant incident workflow.
Hierarchical kill switch. DORA-compliant."How do you verify AI decisions aren't hallucinated?"
Multi-LLM verification: 5 tiers from self-critique to full consensus (2 producers + consolidator + judge + fact-checker). The AI TRiSM cockpit shows a unified risk score (0–100) combining coherence, verification, DLP, and watchdog signals. Per-agent risk matrix identifies your weakest links.
5-tier verification. Unified TRiSM score."Can you prove compliance mathematically?"
Yes. PVP (Probabilistic Verification Protocol) uses Wilson Score confidence intervals: "with 99.99% confidence, this agent violates policy at most 5% of the time." Not heuristic scoring. Not gut feeling. Statistical proof with configurable epsilon and eta parameters.
Patent-pending PVP. Wilson Score intervals."We need DORA compliance for financial resilience"
15 DORA controls implemented. Kill switch satisfies Article 11 (response and recovery). Incident workflow covers detection, classification, response, and notification. Business continuity testing via watchdog simulation. The compliance cockpit tracks DORA readiness specifically.
15 DORA controls. Article 11 compliant.Hierarchical kill switch (agent → team → tenant). DORA-compliant incident response workflow. Auto-recovery from expired emergency actions. Watchdog with 7 detectors monitoring team health. Cascading governance — stop one agent, stop a team, stop everything.
5-tier multi-LLM verification pipeline. Coherence layer with drift detection (5 scoring signals). Unified TRiSM risk score combining all trust signals. Threat intelligence: injection attempts, PII exposures, behavioral anomalies. Automated remediation rules.
Patent-pending Probabilistic Verification Protocol. CSPRNG-seeded sampling. Wilson Score confidence intervals. Configurable assurance levels: high (99.9999%, 1% threshold), standard (99.99%, 5%), light (99.9%, 10%). Automatic bidirectional autonomy: trust expands when agents prove compliance, contracts when they don't.
Patent-pending technologyFrom "we have incident response" to hierarchical kill switch with one-click shutdown
From "we trust the AI" to mathematical proof of compliance via Wilson Score intervals
From "we monitor outputs" to 5-tier multi-LLM verification with unified TRiSM scoring
From "we're working on DORA" to 15 controls implemented with compliance cockpit tracking
Kill switch. Verification. Statistical proof. 30-minute risk briefing.